January 2006 Index
 
Home Page


Editor’s Note
: This is not a recent study, but it fits well with the context of expanding eLearning to new populations of learners as the technology becomes available. It provides a time dimension to remind us that adoption with confidence or comfort is not an instant process for individuals without prior experience and that comfort in using technology takes longer those who learn at a distance. This study is limited to browsers, but each successive technology, such as messaging and blogging, has its own take-off, development and saturation (s-curve) as described by Derek J. de Solla Price (1963). Little Science, Big Science.

A Longitudinal Study of the Uptake of
and Confidence in using WWW Browsers
among Parks Management Students

Dirk H.R. Spennemann

Abstract

The 1990’s saw an unprecedented growth of the WWW. It was assumed that students would correspondingly take up the associated technologies. Between 1995 and 2000 a longitudinal study was carried out to test the usage and confidence of students using WWW browsers in a university environment. The results show that use of the WWW has increased to near saturation levels although a bias is evident between male and female users. A correlation was established between the frequency of use and confidence with which WWW browsers are being used.

Keywords: confidence, WWW, students, longitudinal

Introduction

In the mid 1990s a brave new world of telecommunications in the form of the information superhighway beckoned. It was touted as offering great promise of becoming the great leveller, allowing anybody with access to a server, to gain access to a huge amount of data well beyond that currently available in their local geographical area. Brick and mortar infrastructure would no longer be a barrier to this exciting information age that was available to those who had access to the Internet and more particularly to the World Wide Web (WWW). Information technology has effectively changed the mode of delivery of many of the traditional paper based resources to those now being delivered electronically. It also has brought about an increasing reliance on the use of such technology both as a tool to access communication resources but also as the means to facilitate learning and teaching Australia (cf. Atkinson et al 1997; Spennemann 1999). The technology associated with the WWW has opened up new options in areas from electronic commerce to online education. For example, information technology has now become an integral medium for the delivery of teaching and learning resources in tertiary institutions throughout Australia (cf. Atkinson et al 1997). This increased reliance on technology has meant that people wishing to access information resources need to be competent and confident users of the available technology. The industry and many ‘hawkish’ proponents assert that this is a given and it should be of no concern. Yet such concerns have been raised for rural areas (Valentine and Holloway 2001) and for poor developing countries (Spennemann et al 1996).

It has been claimed that information technology has a significant impact on education and it technology is an area that students can not afford to ignorant about (Schott and Selwyn 2000). However not all students utilise new technologies in the same way with factors such as gender (Brosnan 1998; Clegg 2001) and the personal learning styles of the users affecting how they are used (Shuell and Faber 2001). Other barriers that might affect the adoption of information technology in an education environment include the lecturer’s attitude or perception about a technology, the student’s competency level with the technology, the availability and accessibility of the hardware and the software (Atkinson and Spennemann in press; Honey et al. 2000; Spennemann and Atkinson 2002a, 2002b, in press), the presence of technical personnel and institutional support, and a program for staff development and skill building (Rogers 2000)

From an educational stand point, much of the literature deals with students’ learning based on computer aided technologies (cf Spennemann 1998, 1999). Other studies have looked at the attitudes and skill levels of high school students (Meredyth et al 1999, 2000) and first year students (Lim and Kendle 2001, Lim and Lee 2000, Flowers et al 2000, Palmer and Bray 2001, Spennemann 1996).

The authors carried out a longitudinal study into computer use and confidence among Environmental Science Students at an Australian Institution from 1995 to 2000 (Spennemann & Atkinson 2002a). Some aspects such as data management behaviour (Spennemann and Atkinson 2002b), e-mail usage (Spennemann and Atkinson 2002b) and aspects of gender on computing (Atkinson and Spennemann in press) have been reported elsewhere. In this paper we will report on a longitudinal study into the use of the World Wide Web software applications among park management students. The findings from the 2000 study will also be compared to a cohort of students studying information technology.

The Study

A study was conceptualised in 1995 as a quality assurance exercise for the subject PKM 266 Cultural Resource Management, at Charles Sturt University (Albury, New South Wales, Australia). The aim of this study was to assess the computer access, abilities and confidence level of the student population when using the World Wide Web. This exercise developed into a longitudinal study sampling both the entire internal and the entire external student population enrolled in the subject during the period 1995 to 2000. The survey instrument was an anonymous, compulsory questionnaire handed out at first lecture (2nd semester, 1st year). It relied on self-reporting and self-evaluation by the student and elicited the required information through multiple options and attitudinal responses using a 6- and 9-point Likert scale. Because of the quality assurance character of the study the return rate of the questionnaire was 100% of the students attending class.

The survey was administered in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 2000 to the internal student population and in 1995, 1997 and 2000 to the distance education students. No data were collected for 1999 when the principal author (Spennemann) was on sabbatical and the subject PKM 266 was taught by a relief lecturer.

The cohorts analysed during the respective studies were drawn from students undertaking the Parks Management and Ecotourism degrees taught in the Faculty of Science and Agriculture. From 2000 students in Information Technology were also included in this research. Anecdotal evidence and long-term teaching experience by staff suggest that the bulk of the Parks Management students were apathetic towards computer technology and that many express dislike and even anxiety. In this regard, this cohort of students appeared to be a representative sample of students in ‘real world’.

The parks management student population falls into two parts, those students studying in face-to-face mode at Albury campus, and those students studying in distance education mode from their home location. These locations vary widely and range from capital cities (such as Sydney, Brisbane or Melbourne) to parks rangers working in remote national parks with limited communications access, including delayed mail delivery and unreliable telecommunications. This has always posed a special challenge and the new rollout of technology has not always alleviated this (Spennemann 1995).

The internal students are, on average, straight school leavers (62% aged 18-19 in 2000), while the external students are on average in their early to mid-thirties, are in full-time or part-time paid work, often in related fields or actually as a ranger in one of the parks management services.

With the exception of 1999, the male to female student ratio is close to 1:1 among the internal student population of the core subject PKM 266. The gender balance was originally more skewed towards the males among the external population.

Given the fact that CSU is a regional university, it was of interest to ascertain whether the attitudes towards the use of the World Wide Web might vary depending upon their previous geographical location. About half the student population (both internal and external) came from rural areas, followed by students from non-capital cities and metropolitan students. Among the external student population the percentage of students from rural backgrounds is on the increase.

WWW browser use

A WWW browser is a software application that allows users to interface with the World Wide Web (WWW). The WWW was commercially introduced in 1993 and since that time its usage and growth has been exponential (Haynal 2000). The two most common WWW browsers available today are MS Explorer and Netscape. A WWW browser is simple and intuitive to learn and it is the tool that enables users to access large amounts of on-line hypertext information.

Unlike other applications, such as word processors, spreadsheets and databases, WWW browsers are a recent development and one that is inextricably linked to the development of the internet/WWW as a communications and information provision tool. Thus it can be posited that as the information content increases, as measured in the number of websites and the number of pages, this could and should result in an increase in its use. In short, while standard applications, such as word processors, have a confined market, the WWW continues to be a rapidly expanding resource. The increased popularity of the WWW should be reflected in the use of the WWW browser both in absolute terms and relative to other applications.

For the first part of this research the cohorts were asked to indicate their usage and confidence in the use of the WWW. In particular, participants were asked to self-assess the frequency of use of WWW browsers. Respondents were asked to select one of the following answers with regard to their usage of a WWW browser: ‘never/not yet,’ ‘seldom,’ ‘once in a while,’ ‘often,’ ‘regularly’ and 'daily.'

The popularity of a WWW browser is reflected by the dramatic increase in its usage by the students in this survey (table 1). For example, while in 1995 46% of all internal students had never used a WWW browser this number had decreased to less than 5% by 2000. Similarly, whereas fewer than 2% of students used a WWW browser on a regular or daily basis in 1995, this had increased to 50% by 2000.

Table 1
Usage of World Wide Web Browsers

 

Internal Parks

External Parks

IT

 

1995

1996

1997

1998

2000

1995

1997

2000

2000

Never

46.43

22.60

16.00

14.52

3.77

46.03

32.35

4.76

3.03

Seldom

3.57

15.07

18.00

17.74

1.89

4.76

14.71

2.38

3.03

once in a while

10.71

20.55

21.00

24.19

16.98

4.76

13.24

23.81

Often

10.96

8.00

22.58

18.87

8.82

9.52

3.03

Regularly

7.53

12.00

11.29

39.62

1.59

4.41

23.81

12.12

Daily

1.37

3.00

4.84

9.43

4.41

26.19

78.79

no answer

39.29

21.92

22.00

4.84

9.43

42.86

22.06

9.52

N

56

146

98

62

53

62

66

41

33


Figure 1 shows the significant uptake in the usage of World-wide web browsers since 1995. Interesting, this figure also illustrates a levelling out in the use of the WWW since 1997 although the overall usage level of the WWW still remains extremely high.

Figure 1. Uptake of World Wide Web Browser programs over time
as expressed by internal students providing a positive answer. 

Table 2
Internal Student's Usage of World Wide Web Browsers.
Breakdown by Gender

 

1995

1996

1997

1998

2000

 

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Never

59.26

34.48

29.41

17.11

13.21

20.00

17.65

10.71

8.33

Seldom

6.90

14.71

15.79

20.75

15.56

20.59

14.29

3.45

once in a while

11.11

10.34

19.12

22.37

20.75

20.00

20.59

28.57

17.24

16.67

Often

8.82

13.16

11.32

4.44

20.59

25.00

24.14

12.50

Regularly

7.35

7.89

13.21

11.11

17.65

3.57

37.93

41.67

Daily

2.94

4.44

10.71

6.90

12.50

no answer

29.63

48.28

17.65

23.68

20.75

24.44

2.94

7.14

10.34

8.33

N

27

29

68

76

52

44

34

28

29

24

In terms of gender it is not possible to differentiate any trends in the usage of WWW browsers by the internal student population (table 2). On the whole, male students claim to be slightly more regular users—but this may well be the result of a male confidence bias inherent in the self-reporting method used in the survey. Among the external students (table 3), women tended to be less frequent users in the past, but this trend appears to have reversed in 2000. This result contradicts the more general finding of Mitra et al (2000) that men ‘tended to use computers more than women’.

An assessment of the upbringing of the student (metropolitan, non-metropolitan city, rural) showed differences in all samples, but did not reveal any diachronic patterns.

Table 3
External Student's Usage of World Wide Web Browsers.
Breakdown by Gender

 

1995

1997

2000

 

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Fem

Male

Never

58.82

40.00

35.29

31.25

4.17

5.88

Seldom

5.88

4.44

17.65

12.50

5.88

once in a while

6.67

23.53

20.83

23.53

Often

14.71

3.13

8.33

11.76

Regularly

2.22

2.94

6.25

25.00

23.53

Daily

9.38

29.17

23.53

no answer

35.29

46.67

5.88

37.5

12.50

5.88

N

17

44

33

31

23

17


A comparison of the usage of WWW browsers between IT and Parks students in 2000 illustrates a significant difference between the two cohorts (table 1). IT students are more regular users of the WWW with nearly 80% of students using it on a daily basis compared to less than 10% with external Parks students. This result is not surprising as IT students at CSU are required to access a majority of their course resources using a WWW browser. Even though it is expected that this differentiation between Parks and IT students will continue in the future; extrapolation of the expected usage by Parks students suggest that this gap will decrease over the next few years.

Confidence

The level of computer use is one measure of technological change and acceptance. However the extent of computer use does not fully reflect a student's ability to deal with the technology and the associated applications. An alternate approach is to investigate respondents' confidence when using such applications.

To measure their level of confidence, respondents’ were asked to self rate themselves as to the type of user of computer technology they are. Respondents were given the option to select one of the following nine answer options: ‘power user,’ ‘very confident,’ ‘confident,’ ‘comfortable,’ ‘uncomfortable,’ ‘a bit daunted,’ ‘very uneasy,’ ‘near panic,’ and ‘not yet used.’ This approach might create a bias in the gender-specific responses, as males may be more assertive and positive in their responses than women; however the approach detailed is believed to be a good surrogate measure of their actual state of anxiety/confidence.

Statistical analysis (t-test) was carried out to compare between each of the annual averages for the internal and external populations respectively, as well as for the averages for 1995, 1997 and 2000 comparing the internal with the external populations. The average response (coded as 0 for ‘not yet used’ and 8 for ‘power user’) was calculated for each and plotted with their standard deviations as graphs to show the diachronic development of computer confidence.

Table 4
Confidence when using World Wide Web Browsers

 

Internal Parks

External Parks

IT

 

1995

1996

1997

1998

2000

1995

1997

2000

2000

Not yet

39.29

17.12

11.00

9.68

3.77

47.62

25.00

2.38

Near panic

2.74

1.00

1.59

1.47

Very Uneasy

1.79

1.37

2.00

4.84

3.77

1.59

4.41

A bit daunted

8.93

11.64

13.00

11.29

1.89

3.17

13.24

4.76

Uncomfortable

8.93

7.53

9.00

8.06

7.55

1.59

7.35

2.38

Comfortable

3.57

25.34

27.00

27.42

11.32

4.76

10.29

26.19

Confident

11.64

16.00

24.19

28.3

3.17

4.41

19.05

9.09

Very confident

6.85

7.00

8.06

26.42

8.82

35.71

21.21

Power User

1.37

3.00

9.43

1.47

2.38

69.70

no answer

37.50